You can't learn directly from something that is "hard to change."
I saw a tweet that laid out the hard-to-change things that change easily and said, "Learn the hard-to-change things.
How can we learn 'what is hard to change'?"
"It might be a good idea to start by learning about 'things that are changeable.'"
it came to a point where ...
To get it, you first need to gather [specific information
https://gyazo.com/44b704705ba502dc65657bdd1fae8afe https://gyazo.com/118c382ac0863769b24ce9e0e1253065
https://scrapbox.io/files/6380d5a83b4548001dd4323b.png
https://gyazo.com/792914b315b1c641276973c5deac9624
By doing what is planned and executed, it is materialized and output, and the results can be observed. By comparing the results with expectations, the "gap between expectations and reality" (error) is revealed. This error is propagated back by Adjust. Knowledge at a high level of abstraction requires less adjustment.
https://scrapbox.io/files/6380d5b92959a5001ed1ac96.png
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/「変わりにくい」ものを直接学ぶことはできない using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.